The JAOC blog

The issue of grooming gangs has been a dark stain on the fabric of society, and the government's failure to address it adequately has only exacerbated the problem. Despite numerous reports and inquiries highlighting the extent of the abuse, authorities have repeatedly turned a blind eye, allowing these heinous crimes to continue unchecked.

One of the most glaring examples of this failure is the reluctance to launch a comprehensive public inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal. Safeguarding Minister Jess Phillips' decision to block a public inquiry into the Oldham grooming gangs is a case in point. This decision, despite the overwhelming evidence of abuse and the calls for justice from survivors, reflects a broader pattern of inaction and denial.

The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) described child sexual abuse as an "epidemic" in England and Wales, with tens of thousands of victims. Yet, the government's response has been woefully inadequate. The inquiry's recommendations, including the establishment of a child protection authority and mandatory reporting laws, have not been fully implemented. This lack of action has left countless victims without the support and justice they deserve.

The government's failure to act decisively on this issue has not only allowed the abuse to continue but has also eroded public trust in the institutions meant to protect the most vulnerable. The reluctance to investigate crimes committed by grooming gangs, often due to fears of negative publicity or accusations of racism, has further compounded the problem.

In conclusion, the government's failure to address the issue of grooming gangs is a damning indictment of its commitment to protecting vulnerable children. The need for a comprehensive public inquiry and the full implementation of the IICSA's recommendations is more urgent than ever. Only then can we begin to restore faith in our institutions and ensure that such atrocities are never allowed to happen again.

The recent political spat between Nigel Farage and Elon Musk has captured the attention of many. The fallout began when Musk, the tech billionaire and owner of the social media platform X, publicly criticised Farage, the leader of Reform UK, stating that Farage "doesn't have what it takes" to lead the party. This unexpected comment came after a series of tweets from Musk supporting jailed Tommy Robinson, a stance that Farage has distanced himself from.

Farage, known for his role in leading the Brexit campaign, has always maintained a clear boundary against associating  Robinson. However, Musk's vocal support for Robinson and his call for Farage to step down have created a rift between the two. This disagreement highlights the challenges Farage faces in balancing his party's image while navigating the complex landscape of political alliances and public perceptions.

The spat has also raised questions about the influence of powerful figures like Musk in politics. While Musk's financial backing and media presence could have been advantageous for Reform UK, his controversial statements and unpredictable behaviour pose significant risks. Farage's response to Musk's criticism was firm, stating that he would not compromise his principles, even if it meant losing Musk's support.

This incident underscores the delicate nature of political leadership and the importance of maintaining integrity in the face of external pressures. As Farage continues to lead Reform UK, he must navigate these challenges while staying true to his party's core values and mission. The outcome of this spat will likely have lasting implications for both Farage's political career and the future of Reform UK.

The guidance provided by UK authorities is nearly laughable, if it weren't so serious, and it would not be surprising if the UK experiences an increase in attacks similar to those currently observed in the USA. This situation does not appear to be the result of a coordinated effort by a specific organization—of which I have my doubts—but rather a combination of disaffected Islamic extremists acting in groups without centralised direction.

Advice is:

“The terrorist threat level in the UK remains at ‘substantial’, meaning an attack is likely.

“Public vigilance is critical to our efforts to keep our communities safe and we continue to ask people to report anything that doesn’t feel right to the police.

“Always call 999 in an emergency.”

The UK’s threat level had been ‘severe’ after an attack on a Liverpool hospital but it was downgraded to ‘substantial’ in February 2022.

At least four terror plots have been foiled in the UK since.

Al-Arfat Hassan plotted to kill in an unspecified attack in London but was caught and he appeared in court last year. Police also foiled Edward Little before he could carry out a gun attack in Hyde Park.

In 2023, Mohammad Sohail Farooq was arrested on suspicion of planning terrorist attacks on a hospital and an RAF base in leeds. And in February 2024, a college student who wrote a “how-to” guide on weapons and bombs dedicated to “misfits” and “social nobodies” was found guilty of terror offences.

What do politicians truly anticipate by allowing tens of thousands of men to reside in luxury accommodations without any oversight? These individuals enjoy full meals, possess the latest smartphones, and have ample free time to contemplate why the British seem to have exploited distant lands for generations, benefiting from the resources taken through questionable means.

The significance of January 20th lies in the initiation of three pivotal court cases, all of which connect back to Keir Starmer during his tenure as Director of Public Prosecutions. These cases are shrouded in allegations of a cover-up, as suggested by various sources. Coincidentally, this date also marks the beginning of Starmer's world tour and coincides with Trump's inauguration.

Court cases 

1. Ricky Jones

2. Anthony Essen 

3, Axel Rudakubana

It is essential to remain vigilant and discerning amidst the distractions surrounding these cases and to anticipate the potential repercussions. I am concerned about the possibility of new confrontations arising from the current climate, which may lead to widespread unrest. To avert chaos, it is crucial to stay alert and aware of our surroundings, ready to make difficult choices to safeguard our families' futures in this unpredictable environment. Even those who do not hold religious beliefs might find solace in offering a prayer or two.

### An Ode to the New Year

In the heart of a winter’s eve, Hogmanay’s call,

Echoes through the highlands, through every hall,

With Johnny on guitar, his strings alive,

Cammy with his fiddle, the soul’s revive,

Another Cammy beats the cajon’s heart,

A trio of talents, a world set apart.

Their music rises, a bridge through time,

Uniting hearts in rhythm and rhyme,

Voices lifting, harmonies blend,

A symphony of hope, on which we depend.

In the glow of the fire, the old year fades,

The new year dawns with hopes arrayed,

For in these notes, a promise we find,

Of unity, peace, a world aligned.

Community gathers, with hearts aglow,

In the magic of melodies soft and slow,

For music's power is mighty, grand,

Binding souls across the land.

As the year turns, let this be our song,

A celebration where we all belong,

With music’s gift, we craft our fate,

Building a future, loving and great.

May every chord and every cheer,

Fill our hearts with joy sincere,

And as we step into the new year’s light,

Together, we’ll make the future bright.

JAOC 

### Am Bliadhna Ùr

Seo bliadhna ùr, le solas ùr,

Làn de chothroman agus gàire.

Cuiridh sinn romhainn na aislingean,

A’ sireadh sonas, sìth is màireach.

ENGLISH TRANSLATION 

A New Year is here, with new light,

Full of opportunities and smiles.

We shall pursue our dreams,

Seeking happiness, peace, and tomorrow.

**"When a man is denied the right to live the life he believes in, he has no choice but to become an outlaw."** Nelson Mandela

"Be brave enough to question everything, pursue your truth with unwavering courage, and strive to make a positive impact. By doing so, you will carve a legacy of inspiration and change, leaving a mark that future generations will celebrate and build upon."

JAOC 1st January 2025

#### The Numbers

Over the Christmas period, more than 450 migrants crossed the English Channel on Christmas Day alone. This marked the first arrivals in over a week, as previous poor weather conditions had halted crossings. The total number of arrivals for 2024 has reached over 35,000, a 20% increase from the previous year.

#### The Journey

The journey across the Channel is fraught with danger. Migrants often travel in overcrowded and unseaworthy small boats, facing the risk of capsizing and hypothermia. 

#### The Response

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper claimed efforts have been made to dismantle the organised crime gangs that facilitate these crossings, with increased cooperation between the UK and European authorities. This is like a broken record that is trotted out by every politician regardless of party and im sick of hearing the same old verbal diarrhea.

We need to stop listening to politicians and take action ourselves to stop the tidal wave of unvetted refugees landing on our shores. The only way this will stop will be to enforce a change in the way we are goverened and block our borders using our navy. We prevent them crossing over the French line then its a French problem. They will not want to be overun and they will in turn protect their border and then countries will start the push back. Or is that just too simple ? 

Homelessness among veterans in the UK is a pressing issue that has garnered significant attention in recent years. Despite various efforts to address the problem, many former service members find themselves without a stable place to call home. This blog explores the current state of veteran homelessness in the UK, the factors contributing to this issue, and the initiatives aimed at providing support and solutions.

The Current State of Veteran Homelessness

According to recent estimates, veterans make up approximately 3-6% of the homeless population in the UK2. While this percentage may seem small, it represents a significant number of individuals who have served their country and now face the harsh realities of life on the streets. The Royal British Legion has highlighted that the proportion of veterans among the homeless population in London has decreased from over 20% in the 1990s to around 6% in recent years. However, the issue remains a critical concern, with many veterans rendered "invisible" by the way statistics are collected.

Factors Contributing to Veteran Homelessness

Several factors contribute to the homelessness experienced by veterans.

These include:

1. Mental Health Issues: Many veterans suffer from mental health conditions such as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety, which can make it challenging to maintain stable housing.

2. Substance Abuse: Alcohol and drug abuse are prevalent among homeless veterans, often as a coping mechanism for the trauma experienced during service.

3. Lack of Support Networks: Transitioning from military to civilian life can be difficult, especially for those without strong support networks. The loss of camaraderie and structure provided by the military can leave veterans feeling isolated and vulnerable.

4. Economic Hardships: Financial instability, unemployment, and lack of affordable housing are significant barriers that prevent veterans from securing and maintaining a home.

Initiatives and Support

The UK government and various organizations have launched several initiatives to address veteran homelessness. One notable effort is Op FORTITUDE, a government-funded hotline and referral pathway designed to provide homeless veterans with access to housing and support services. This initiative aims to end veteran rough sleeping by offering a single point of contact for veterans in need and connecting them with housing providers, charities, and local authorities3.

Additionally, the Veterans' Strategy Action Plan 2022-24 outlines the government's commitment to ending veteran homelessness within the current Parliament. This plan includes funding for wraparound support services, specialist medical care, and employment assistance to help veterans reintegrate into civilian life.

Conclusion

The number of homeless veterans in the UK remains a significant issue. It appears that there is no limit to the amount of money spent on illegal migrants, while former military personnel who sacrificed their lives for their country are not considered deserving of adequate funding. Keir Starmer's offer of a mere 3 million pounds seems insufficient, especially when he spends 6 billion on illegal immigrants. It deeply upsets me that as "British people," we allow our government to dismiss this issue as unimportant, allowing them to remain in power while being oblivious to the concerns of the public. It is crucial to address the root causes of veteran homelessness and provide comprehensive support services to ensure that those who have served their country can find stability and security in their civilian lives. It is disheartening to witness the stark contrast between how well Starmer and his crew live, feasting on the best of everything, while the rest of us struggle for the basics. It is high time we displayed some determination and reclaimed our country, but I fear this won't happen as long as everyone remains complacent, expecting someone else to take action. I have family members and friends, including my grandfather, who are buried in various locations around the world where they fought on behalf of our country.

Keir Starmer's Broken Manifesto Promises: A Closer Look

Keir Starmer, has faced significant criticism for failing to deliver on several key promises made during his leadership campaign and subsequent elections. As we reflect on his tenure, it's essential to examine some of the most notable broken promises and their implications for the public and the political landscape.

Key Broken Promises

1. Tuition Fees: One of the most significant promises was the abolition of tuition fees. Starmer initially pledged to scrap tuition fees, a policy that resonated with many young voters. However, this promise was later abandoned, leaving students and their families scratching their heads in disbelief.

2. Nationalisation of Public Services: Starmer's leadership campaign included a commitment to nationalise key public services, such as rail, mail, and energy. Despite the initial enthusiasm, these plans were scaled back, with the Labour Party opting for a more moderate approach. In other words he exaggerated which seems to be normal for Pinocchio's brother.

3. Support for WASPI Women: The Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI) campaign received strong backing from Starmer and his allies during the election. They promised to deliver "fair and fast" compensation to women affected by changes to the state pension age. However, this promise was not fulfilled, leading widespread   anger among the affected women and again it was only used to get votes on the basis of  complete lie.

4. Winter Fuel Payments: Another broken promise was the commitment to maintain winter fuel payments for pensioners. The Labour Party's decision to strip up to 10 million pensioners of this lifeline has sparked outrage and concern, particularly among vulnerable elderly population.

5. Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG): Starmer's manifesto included a pledge to halve violence against women and girls within a decade. Despite the ambitious promise, the necessary government effort and support for third-sector organizations have not materialised, leaving many victims without adequate support.

Implications and Public Reaction

The failure to deliver on these promises has had significant implications for Starmer's credibility and the Labour Party's reputation. Many voters feel betrayed and disillusioned, questioning the party's commitment to its pledges. The broken promises have also fuelled political opponents' criticisms, further complicating Labour's efforts to regain public trust.

Conclusion

Keir Starmer's tenure as Labour leader has been marked by high-profile broken promises. When i hear his voice he makes my skin crawl and i reach for the off button as everything he says appears to be a lie and that's how he kept his mistress from his wife but like all liars he gets found out and he has.

A Year in Review and What Lies Ahead for 2025

2024 has been a tumultuous year for the retail industry, with numerous well-known brands succumbing to financial pressures and closing their doors. The combination of declining footfall, rising costs, and changing consumer habits has created a perfect storm, leading to a wave of bankruptcies and store closures. Let's take a closer look at some of the notable retailers that went bust in 2024 and what the future holds for the retail sector in 2025.

Retailers That Went Bust in 2024

1. Hadfields Bakery: This Huddersfield-based retailer, with 13 stores and a bakery, went into administration in November due to cash-flow issues.

2. Homebase: The DIY giant collapsed into administration in November but was bought out in a rescue deal by CDS Superstores, owner of The Range and Wilko.

3. Martlet Group (i-Ride): The Brighton-based cycle retailer went into administration in October, with all staff made redundant.

4. Caviar House & Prunier: The airport retailer and restaurant went into administration in September but was acquired by SBC Sites.

5. CTD Tiles: The tile supplier and retailer, with 86 outlets, went into administration in mid-August.

6. The Floor Room: This flooring company, which traded from 34 concessions in John Lewis stores, went into administration, causing the job losses of almost 200 staff.

7. The Vampire's Wife: The cult clothing firm went into administration towards the end of July.

8. Carpetright: The carpet and flooring retailer was acquired by rival Tapi after appointing administrators earlier this year.

9. Smiffys: The fancy-dress retailer went into administration following a fall in sales and increased costs.

10. Ted Baker: The US owner of high street fashion brand Ted Baker appointed administrators in March.

11. The Body Shop: The high street cosmetics chain appointed administrators in February.

12. Orange Bikes: The Halifax-based company was rescued by director Ashley Ball.

13. Tile Choice: The Midlands tile wholesaler and retailer went into administration in January.

14. Sook: The retail pop-up specialist went into administration on December 31, 2023.

The Outlook for 2025

As we look ahead to 2025, the retail landscape is expected to continue evolving. Here are some key trends and predictions for the coming year:

1. Digital Transformation: Retailers will increasingly embrace digital technologies to enhance customer experiences and streamline operations. AI and machine learning will play a significant role in personalizing shopping experiences and optimizing inventory management.

2. Social Commerce: Social media platforms will become more integral to retail, not just for marketing but also as direct sales channels. The growth of social commerce is expected to continue, driven by platforms like Instagram and TikTok.

3. Sustainability and ESG: Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors will become more critical for retailers. Consumers are increasingly demanding sustainable and ethical practices, and retailers will need to adapt to meet these expectations.

4. Resilience and Adaptability: The ability to adapt to changing market conditions will be crucial. Retailers that can quickly pivot their strategies and operations in response to economic and consumer shifts will be better positioned for success.

5. Omnichannel Retailing: The integration of online and offline channels will continue to be a key focus. Retailers will need to provide seamless and cohesive experiences across all touchpoints to meet consumer expectations.

 Retailers that can leverage technology, and remain adaptable will be the only ones with a possibility of being ableto survive in this rapidly difficult  retail landscape.

Rupert Lowe, a prominent figure in both the business and political arenas, has had a diverse and eventful career. Known for his roles in various companies and his tenure as a Member of Parliament (MP) for Great Yarmouth under the Reform UK party, Lowe’s journey is marked by significant achievements and controversies.

Business Ventures

Rupert Lowe’s business portfolio is extensive. He has held directorial positions in over 50 companies, including:

PE487 Ltd

(06802470)

A company involved in freeze-drying pharmaceutical-related business. This is also linked with Biopharma technology ltd (03347404) Biopharma process systems ltd (02337313) and forms the Biopharma Group.

www.biopharma.co.uk  

This company was heavily involved in helping the pharmaceutical industry in vaccine storage and processing but not in development. 

J Brand Limited

( 00279524) data-related contractor who specialises in data and surveillance systems.He also holds directorships in multiple data systems companies.

Hills building services ltd

(01443221) This company was liquidated, leading to a report criticising the directors for their management practices. This incident raised questions about his business acumen and ethical standards.

Digme fitness ltd 

(09631514) This company was also liquidated after it recieved significant funding through the furlough scheme taxpayers money. He is also closely linked with Sunak through Akshata Narayan Murty who is his Sunaks wealthy wife and a director of this company. 

Pangea Holdings Ltd 

(004155V)

On his parliamentary interests.

Isle of Man insurance  company very little information on them apart from they were funded by Pangea Loanco ltd (14127426).

Pangea Loanco Ltd operates under the veil of limited liability partnerships, which can obscure the identities of its investors. That said, I have identified one of the investors, Jamie Constable, the founder of RCapital. While I’m not suggesting that Jamie is involved in any illegal activities, this situation raises questions about Rupert’s transparency with the public, considering he also employs similar structures to enhance his wealth. It's worth noting that limited liability partnerships have, in some instances, been associated with funding illegal activities, including child trafficking.

The rest of his business interests are too many to mention but there is absolutely no possibility can he dedicate his time to his constituency. Everything he is involved in from gold mining in Australia to online security and much more substantiates my observations.

If you review the companies hes involved in you will also find a link to swift incorporations , Finchley road and that is a significant red light.

Political Career

Rupert Lowe’ is now serving as the MP for Great Yarmouth since July 2024.

Net Worth

Estimating Rupert Lowe’s net worth is challenging but is estimated at £30 million. However, his extensive business interests and property holdings suggest a substantial financial portfolio. Lowe owns agricultural land in Gloucestershire, commercial properties in Oxford and London, and residential property.

Conclusion

He appears to be just another politician delivering sound bites that people want to hear while conveniently hiding his hand in activities that most of us would find unacceptable. It's disheartening to witness how the wealthy and those in power continue to exploit the tax system, believing they can spin any narrative to keep their agendas under wraps. The sooner we recognise the smoke and mirrors at play, the better equipped we will be to push for meaningful change.

Geoengineering, the deliberate large-scale intervention in the Earth’s natural systems to counteract climate change, has been a topic of intense debate and research. To shed light on the global state of geoengineering, the ETC Group, in collaboration with the Heinrich Böll Foundation, has developed an interactive map that documents various geoengineering projects worldwide.

What is the Geoengineering Monitor Map?

The Geoengineering Monitor Map is an online tool that provides a comprehensive overview of geoengineering projects and experiments across the globe. This map is designed to increase transparency and awareness about the scope and scale of geoengineering activities. It includes projects related to:

• Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS):

Techniques aimed at capturing carbon dioxide emissions from sources like power plants and storing it underground to prevent it from entering the atmosphere.

• Solar Radiation Management (SRM):

Methods intended to reflect a small percentage of the sun’s light and heat back into space to cool the planet.

• Weather Modification:

Efforts to alter weather patterns, such as cloud seeding to induce rain.

• Other Approaches:

Various other experimental techniques aimed at mitigating climate change impacts.

Key Features of the Map

• Interactive Interface: Users can explore the map interactively, zooming in on specific regions to see detailed information about individual projects.

• Project Details:

Each project listed on the map includes information about its objectives, methods, and current status.

• Global Coverage:

The map covers over 800 geoengineering projects worldwide, highlighting the extensive nature of these efforts.

Importance of the Geoengineering Monitor Map

The map serves several critical purposes:

• Transparency:

By making information about geoengineering projects publicly accessible, the map promotes transparency and accountability in climate intervention research.

• Awareness:

It helps raise awareness about the potential risks and benefits of geoengineering, fostering informed public discourse.

• Policy Making:

Policymakers can use the map as a resource to understand the landscape of geoengineering activities and make informed decisions about regulation and governance.

Conclusion

The Geoengineering Monitor Map by ETC Group is a valuable resource for anyone interested in the current state of geoengineering. It provides a detailed and accessible overview of ongoing projects, helping to demystify this complex and often controversial field. As climate change continues to pose significant challenges, tools like this map are essential for fostering transparency, awareness, and informed decision-making.

Explore for yourself

Geoengineering Map

Recently, Tesco issued a recall for its Tesco 10 Cooked Beef Slices due to an incorrect use-by date. The affected packs, which were supposed to have a use-by date of December 24, 2024, mistakenly displayed January 24, 2025. This error could pose health risks if the product is consumed past its actual shelf life. 

This incident highlights the importance of knowing where our food comes from and the benefits of buying directly from local farmers. Here are some reasons why sourcing food directly from farmers can be a better choice:

1. Freshness and Quality

When you buy directly from farmers, you get produce that is often harvested at its peak ripeness. This means the food is fresher and retains more nutrients compared to products that have traveled long distances.

2. Supporting Local Economy

Buying from local farmers helps keep money within the community. This supports local businesses and creates job opportunities, fostering economic growth and stability.

3. Transparency and Trust

Directly purchasing from farmers allows you to learn about their farming practices and ensure that the food you consume aligns with your values. This transparency builds trust and confidence in the food you eat.

4. Environmental Benefits

Local farming often involves sustainable practices that reduce the carbon footprint associated with food transportation. By buying locally, you contribute to a healthier environment and support eco-friendly farming methods.

5. Community Connections

Visiting local farms and farmers' markets fosters a sense of community and connection. It provides an opportunity to meet the people who grow your food and learn about seasonal produce and sustainable agriculture.

Conclusion

The recent Tesco meat recall serves as a reminder of the potential risks associated with mass-produced food. By choosing to buy directly from local farmers, we can enjoy fresher, healthier food while supporting our local economy and environment. It's a win-win for everyone involved!

In a surprising turn of events, Labour's recent announcement about potentially cancelling local elections has sparked a heated debate across the UK. The move, which is part of Labour's broader devolution plans, has been met with both support and criticism from various political factions and the public.

The Devolution Plan

Labour's devolution plan, spearheaded by Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, aims to give local areas greater powers by merging and closing some local councils. This restructuring is intended to streamline governance and improve efficiency. However, it also means that some local elections scheduled for next year may be postponed or cancelled altogether.

The Political Backlash

The announcement has not gone unnoticed by opposition parties. Reform UK, in particular, has accused Labour of "running scared" from the ballot box. They argue that the cancellation of elections in key areas where Reform UK has been gaining momentum is a strategic move to stifle their progress. Nigel Farage, a prominent figure in Reform UK, has been vocal about his disapproval, branding Labour's actions as undemocratic and a threat to democracy.

The Government's Justification

Jim McMahon, the Minister for Local Government, has defended the decision, stating that the reorganisation of local councils is necessary for the devolution plan to succeed. He argues that holding elections for councils that may soon be merged or abolished would be counterproductive. Instead, he suggests that elections should be held for "shadow bodies" that will eventually form the new councils.

Public Reaction

The public's reaction to the potential cancellation of local elections has been mixed. Some see it as a necessary step towards more efficient local governance, but the majority view it as an attempt to undermine democratic processes. The debate continues to rage on social media and in political circles, with many calling for greater transparency and accountability from the government.

Conclusion

As Labour pushes forward with its devolution plans, the controversy surrounding the potential cancellation of local elections is unlikely to die down anytime soon. Whether this move will ultimately benefit local governance or hinder democratic participation remains to be seen. One thing is certain: the political landscape in the UK is set for some significant changes in the coming months. Labour led by the crazy gang would an amazing job in a dark hole in the ground with the woke left as that small group of mindless dimwits knitting tank tops and lapping up the 1322 genders will just agree to anything that Keir says.