If you appreciate my efforts, I kindly ask you to consider supporting my website with a small donation, if possible, or by leaving a comment and rating my site. Your support is invaluable as I strive to uncover the truth and share it with the public, often at significant personal risk.
Watch this hard hitting interview part one of a series of explosive revelations
THE HONEST MIDWIFE
POLICE HARASSMENT, LABOUR COUNCILLOR, NHS TRUST AND MUCH MORE.
Her complete story will be shared in detail on this page soon. In the meantime, please follow her on X to stay updated on her ongoing narrative. The revelations and facts she presented in February 2024 were shocking, as she alerted everyone to circumstances that could have saved numerous lives. The memories of those children and their families have been unjustly taken from this world. The joy a baby brings to a family is immeasurable, and the repercussions of this situation will leave future generations at a loss.
All other NHS whistleblowers and documents here : EXPOSING THE NHS | JAOC.ORG.UK
Transparency is essential for NHS trusts, particularly regarding the working conditions and support available to midwives. The Royal College of Midwives (RCM) generates nearly £10 million annually and is recognized as one of the wealthiest unions in the UK.
Whistleblowers are stepping forward to bring attention to critical concerns within the profession, expressing dissatisfaction with the insufficient support, lack of transparency, and efforts to deter midwives from pursuing Industrial tribunals. There have been several instances where representatives intentionally delayed midwives, causing their cases to expire and eliminating the possibility of pursuing this avenue, which is an unacceptable practice by the union. The names of these representatives will be disclosed soon.
These whistleblowers have raised concerns about the lack of support midwives receive, including complaints about long working hours without breaks, which can endanger the lives of both mothers and unborn babies.
One of the pressing issues is the significant decline in birth rates since the COVID-19 vaccinations, a trend that has not been adequately highlighted. This decline has raised concerns among midwives and healthcare professionals, who believe that more transparency and investigation are needed to understand the underlying causes.
2019 : 640,370 live births
Births in England and Wales - Office for National Statistics
2020: 613,936 live births
Births in England and Wales - Office for National Statistics
2022: 605,479 live births
Births in England and Wales - Office for National Statistics
2023: 591,072 live births
Births in England and Wales - Office for National Statistics
In 2021, there was a modest increase to 624,828; however, this number remains significantly lower than the figures recorded before the pandemic, indicating a 7.7% decrease in England and Wales compared to pre-pandemic levels.
It is quite alarming that NHS England has not provided reliable data on miscarriages, despite numerous whistleblowers confirming a significant increase based on their experiences. Conversely, NHS England does publish statistics on stillbirths; however, they introduced a new formula in 2023.
2019: 2,522 stillbirths = 0.4 %
2020: 2,371 stillbirths = 0.387 %
2021: 2,597 stillbirths = 0.416 %
Stillbirth data - Office for National Statistics covers 2019 to 2021
2022: 2,349 stillbirths = 0.39 %
Stillbirths - Office for National Statistics
2023: 3.9 stillbirths per 1,000 births in England and 4.0 in Wales
Births in England and Wales - Office for National Statistics
In 2023, using the previous calculation methods, the number of stillbirths is reported as 2,304, which represents 0.39%. This figure appears to remain consistent and contradicts claims that miscarriages have significantly increased; logically, one would expect stillbirths to rise as well. However, this is where the narrative begins to falter. If whistleblowers indicate that families are experiencing higher losses, yet the trusts' statistics do not reflect this, the reliability of the data comes into question. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) could easily generate a report based on the data submitted by each trust if they ran off one system but they don't. This situation highlights a disconnect, suggesting that there is a system in place that defies conventional business logic, indicating that NHS England operates independently of standard practices.
Additionally, there are serious concerns about the handling of stillborn babies and miscarriages. The paper trail from hospitals to mortuaries is often unclear, leading to questions about the proper documentation and investigation of these tragic events. This lack of transparency can prevent families from receiving the closure and answers they need.
In England, NHS trusts use a variety of reporting systems, and there isn't a single unified system across all trusts. Each trust may use different systems based on their specific needs and requirements. Some of the key systems include the General Practice Data Hub, Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework (ASCOF), Secure Electronic File Transfer (SEFT), Primary Care Web Tool (PCWT), Clinical Audits and Registries Management Service (CARMS), and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES)
NHS ENGLAND
Our ASPIRATION
Having different reporting systems make it challenging to generate a single, centralised report. Each NHS trust need to supply their data individually, which can then be aggregated and analysed to create a comprehensive report. This decentralised approach can lead to variations in data formats, reporting standards, and timelines, making the process more complex and time-consuming. Therefore leaving it open to not only mistakes but also manipulation and he lack of transparency when requiring information on systemic abuse.
As of April 2020, there are 217 NHS trusts in England. These trusts include acute hospital trusts, ambulance trusts, mental health trusts, and more. The number and composition of trusts can change over time due to mergers, dissolutions, and other organisational changes
Stem Cells
Stem cells are a special type of cells with the following properties:
They can self-renew, making more cells like themselves.
They can differentiate into other specialised cells in the body.
They serve as a repair system for the body.
There are two main types: embryonic stem cells and adult stem cells.
Another major concern is the control and use of stem cells taken from the placenta. These stem cells are often whisked away by private companies, raising ethical and regulatory questions about their use and the benefits they provide. Ensuring that there is a clear and transparent process for the handling and use of these stem cells is essential to maintain public trust and ensure ethical practices. The websites of all such companies state " they are instrumental in providing samples to organisations to help with finding cures for illnesses".
Umbilical cord blood is the blood that remains in your baby’s umbilical cord and placenta after they are born. This blood is a rich source of young and powerful stem cells that parents can save for their children to use in various therapies.
It's unclear whether parents are giving their approval and if they understand that these cells might also be used by different companies to search for disease cures. This highlights a gap in regulations that could lead to misuse, indicating a need for more thorough investigation.
The regulations surrounding the use of placenta-derived stem cells for disease cures can vary significantly depending on the country. Generally, these regulations are designed to ensure the safety, efficacy, and ethical use of stem cells in medical treatments.
In the UK, the use of placenta-derived stem cells is regulated by several key frameworks to ensure ethical and safe practices. Here are some of the main points:
-
Human Tissue Act 2004: This act regulates the removal, storage, and use of human tissue, including stem cells. It requires that any activity involving human tissue must be licensed by the Human Tissue Authority (HTA) and must have appropriate consent.
-
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 (as amended): This act governs the use of human embryos and the creation of embryonic stem cell lines. It is overseen by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA).
-
Code of Practice for the Use of Human Stem Cell Lines: This code provides guidance on best practices for working with stem cell lines and specifies oversight mechanisms for research involving human embryonic stem cell lines. It also outlines the requirements for the activities of the UK Stem Cell Bank.
-
Research Ethics Committees (RECs): Any research involving human stem cells must be approved by a recognized REC. These committees ensure that the research is conducted ethically and in accordance with regulatory requirements.
Stem Cell International
Fami Corp Group own Smart Cells International
Headquarters Lishui, Zhejiang, China.
U.S. headquarters in San Francisco
From this investor report you will see the 2 largest institutional investors are:
Blackrock 10% and Vanguard 8.5%.
UK Clients
NHS and UK Private Hospitals | Private Stem Cell Collection Services
My primary concern is that these regulations are not keeping pace with the rapidly evolving industry, which is largely influenced by enthusiasts. The oversight and transparency regarding these private companies are insufficient, and the absence of centralized records within NHS England indicates that this situation is not entirely managed, leaving it vulnerable to manipulation and misuse.
The investigation is still in progress as we seek the truth, ensuring that every detail is thoroughly examined.
A link exists between stem cells and emerging bio-computing technologies, which will be disclosed shortly. My blog featuring a whistleblower will guide you to the facts, with more information to come soon.
Testimonials
"In a world where misinformation is rampant JAOC.ORG.UK stands out as a beacon of truth. It has become my go-to source for reliable news, and I highly recommend it to anyone seeking factual and unbiased information."
Susan P ( Exeter )
"Amazing investigations detailed and very enlightening. The DOCUMENT section continually being updated is a wonderful idea. Thank you for being a legend."
Tilly family ( Auckland )
Your website provided clear and factual advice on COVID-19, emphasising the importance of informed consent. The resource centre helped our family as we were not getting help or guidance from our local health centre. Highly recommend it for reliable vaccine information.”
Peter & Melissa H ( Cardiff )